From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 2004
8 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

14630.

Decided and Entered: June 17, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered December 2, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sodomy in the first degree.

Kevin Colwell, Albany, for appellant.

Gerald A. Keene, District Attorney, Owego (Irene C. Graven of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of sodomy in the first degree in relation to forcible acts he committed upon an 11-year-old victim (see Penal Law former 130.50 [1]). His sole contention on this appeal concerns the legality of his sentence. In this regard, defendant claims that, inasmuch as he was a "youthful offender," he was improperly sentenced to 2 to 6 years' incarceration.

Pursuant to recent amendments to, among other things, the Penal Law and the Criminal Procedure Law, effective November 1, 2003, Penal Law § 130.50 (1) is described as the crime of "criminal sexual act in the first degree" (L 2003, ch 264, § 20).

We disagree. Although defendant was undoubtedly a "juvenile offender" (CPL 1.20 [2]), in the absence of certain factual findings by County Court, he was ineligible for "youthful offender" treatment because he was convicted of the crime of sodomy in the first degree (CPL 720.10 [a] [iii]). Although County Court stated, at defendant's sentencing, that it was sentencing defendant as a "youthful offender," we view this characterization as a simple misstatement. County Court correctly noted during the plea colloquy that defendant would be sentenced as a "juvenile offender" and the court made no findings, on the record, concerning mitigating circumstances or defendant's "relatively minor" participation in the acts charged (CPL 720.10). Indeed, based upon our review of the record, including defendant's allocution, we find that the sentence suffers from no infirmity (see People v. Serrano, 309 A.D.2d 822, 822-823, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 580; cf. People v. Fields, 287 A.D.2d 577, 578, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 681; People v. Calabro, 157 A.D.2d 736, 738, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 964).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 2004
8 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARRELL J. BAKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

People v. Baker

September 24, 2004. Appeal from the 3d Dept: 8 AD3d 824 (Tioga). Application in criminal case for leave to…