From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 2002
298 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1679

October 1, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter Benitez, J.), rendered October 14, 1997, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 5 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

ALBERT CEVA, for respondent.

AARON P. MICHEAU, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant's challenge to the court's instruction effectively informing the jury that the element of serious physical injury had been established as a matter of law is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the charge was correct because defendant, expressly electing to pursue a defense of misidentification only, conceded the element and agreed to the instruction now at issue (see People v. Flynn, 79 N.Y.2d 879, 881; People v. Lewis, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 1032). In any event, there was ample evidence of serious physical injury.

We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 2002
298 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ALIYAH BAKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
747 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

People v. Lewis

The theory of the defense at trial was that defendant did not intend to use the knife unlawfully, not that it…

People v. Bonilla

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in allowing prejudicial mugshot photos of the…