From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bailey

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Feb 23, 1973
293 N.E.2d 186 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)

Summary

In Bailey a conviction for aggravated battery brought under an indictment similar to the aggravated battery charge in the instant case was reversed due to the insufficiency of the indictment.

Summary of this case from In re Interest of Bryant

Opinion

No. 72-139 Judgment reversed.

February 23, 1973.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Lee County; the Hon. JOHN L. MOORE, Judge, presiding.

William J. Sturgeon, Jr., Public Defender, of Dixon, for appellant.

Albert N. Kennedy, State's Attorney, of Dixon, for the People.


Defendant was found guilty by a jury of aggravated battery and was sentenced to serve from one to five years in the penitentiary.

On appeal, defendant's sole contention is that the indictment is void. In pertinent part the indictment charged:

"* * * that Johnny Bailey * * * committed the offense of AGGRAVATED BATTERY in violation of Paragraph 12-4, Chapter 38, Illinois Revised Statutes, 1969, in that he, the defendant, knowing one Paul Nusbaum to then and there be a police officer of the City of Dixon, Illinois, did intentionally and knowingly without legal justification, cause bodily harm to the said Paul Nusbaum by kicking him * * *."

Although no subsection of Section 12-4 is set forth in the indictment, we presume from the verbiage used that defendant was charged under Section 12-4(b)(6), which provides that a person is guilty of aggravated battery who:

"* * * in committing a battery * * * knows the individual harmed to be a peace officer * * * engaged in the execution of any of his official duties * * *."

• 1 According to this statute, a simple battery inflicted upon a police officer constitutes an aggravated battery only if the officer is "engaged in the execution of any of his official duties." See People v. Spears, 106 Ill. App.2d 430, 435-436 (1969).

• 2 The instant indictment does not set forth an essential element of the offense in that there is no allegation that the police officer was engaged in the execution of his official duties. This element cannot be inferred, as the State alleges, from the wording, "knowing one Paul Nusbaum, to then and there be a police officer."

Finding that the indictment does not contain a necessary element of the offense of aggravated battery as required by Section 111-3(a)(3) of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, sec. 111-3(a)(3)), and under the authority of People v. Plocar, 411 Ill. 141, 146 (1952), defendant's conviction is hereby reversed.

Judgment reversed.

SEIDENFELD, P.J., and ABRAHAMSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bailey

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Feb 23, 1973
293 N.E.2d 186 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)

In Bailey a conviction for aggravated battery brought under an indictment similar to the aggravated battery charge in the instant case was reversed due to the insufficiency of the indictment.

Summary of this case from In re Interest of Bryant
Case details for

People v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNNY BAILEY…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District

Date published: Feb 23, 1973

Citations

293 N.E.2d 186 (Ill. App. Ct. 1973)
293 N.E.2d 186

Citing Cases

People v. Weaver

• 1 It is true that a battery committed against a police officer automatically becomes the offense of…

People v. Smith

It is an essential element of the offense that the correctional institution employee was engaged in the…