From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Babis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that reversible error took place by reason of the trial court's failure to give an alibi charge has not been preserved for appellate review since the defendant neither requested such a charge nor objected to the jury charge on this basis (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Howard, 153 A.D.2d 903). Moreover, we are not inclined to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.15 [c]) in view of the thorough instructions given by the trial court that the defendant's guilt had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Warren, 76 N.Y.2d 773).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Babis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Babis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS BABIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

People v. Irizarry

05; People v. Lassiter, 161 A.D.2d 669). We decline to review the issue in the exercise our interest of…

People v. Bloom

The record does not support the further contention that defendant was denied his right to be present during…