From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Avila

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

354

March 4, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), rendered June 12, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 20 and 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Cynthia J. Pree, for respondent.

Lisa Lewis, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Buckley, Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting expert testimony regarding gang customs and rituals. This testimony was explanatory of defendant's actions and unusual statements at the time of the crime and was relevant to his motive (see People v. Edwards, 295 A.D.2d 270; People v. Tai, 224 A.D.2d 328, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 942). The court's thorough instructions minimized any prejudicial effect. Defendant's related argument concerning the People's summation is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Avila

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Avila

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SANTIAGO AVILA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 885

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in admitting the testimony of an expert witness…

People v. Scott

The defendant's contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that the trial court erred in permitting…