From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Asselta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1956
1 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

April 9, 1956


Appeal from a judgment of a City Magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting appellant of a violation of paragraph a of subdivision 4 of section 20 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (knowingly permitting an unlicensed person to drive a motor vehicle on the public highway), and from the sentence directing appellant to pay a fine of $15. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, complaint dismissed, and fine remitted. Appellant should have been charged with a violation of subdivision 2 of section 41 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which applies to motorcycles, and not with a violation of the statute set forth in the complaint, which applies to motor vehicles. A motorcycle is not a motor vehicle. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 2, subd. 8.) In any event, there is no proof nor are there facts from which it may be inferred that appellant authorized the unlicensed person to operate the motorcycle or had knowledge that said person was not licensed. Under the circumstances, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Asselta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1956
1 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

People v. Asselta

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENZO ASSELTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

People v. Shapiro

The particular part of section 20 (subd. 4, par. a) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law with which we are here…

PEOPLE v. MOE

Furthermore, the "mini-bike" or "mini-motorcycle" here involved comes within the statutory definition of a…