From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Arcuri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1978
64 A.D.2d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

September 29, 1978

Appeal from the Oswego Supreme Court.

Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, plea vacated and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Oswego County, for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: Under the circumstances presented here, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law, § 155.30). Prior to sentencing, the defendant moved to withdraw the plea on the grounds that he was intoxicated at the time of the crime and had no knowledge of the events which gave rise to the indictment. The court properly conducted a hearing to determine whether defendant's application had merit (People v McKennion, 27 N.Y.2d 671, 673). In light of defendant's vigorous protestations of innocence and the absence of prejudice to the People, however, the interests of justice would have been better served had he been permitted to withdraw his guilty plea (see People v East, 39 A.D.2d 606).


Summaries of

People v. Arcuri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1978
64 A.D.2d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Arcuri

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD S. ARCURI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1978

Citations

64 A.D.2d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

People v. Hollmond

For instance, the time that has elapsed between the guilty plea and the motion to vacate it has been…

People v. Gerald

"For instance, the time that has elapsed between the guilty plea and the motion to vacate it has been…