From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 18, 1992
180 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 18, 1992
180 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Aponte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS APONTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 18, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 23

Citing Cases

Anderson A To Anderson G LLC v. Sanchez

Stipulations which purport to waive a benefit of the rent stabilization are generally void on public policy…

97-101 Realty, LLC v. Sanchez

Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) (RSC) § 2520.13 provides, in pertinent part, "An agreement by the tenant to…