From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Anonymous

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2012
98 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-27

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. ANONYMOUS, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yuval Simchi–Levi of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yuval Simchi–Levi of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about November 29, 2011, which, upon remand from this Court (87 A.D.3d 443, 928 N.Y.S.2d 278 [1st Dept. 2011] ), adhered to its prior order denying defendant's CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion ( see e.g. People v. Gonzalez, 29 A.D.3d 400, 815 N.Y.S.2d 75 [1st Dept. 2006],lv. denied7 N.Y.3d 867, 824 N.Y.S.2d 612, 857 N.E.2d 1143 [2006] ). Defendant's extensive criminal record and 30 prison disciplinary infractions outweighed the positive factors cited by defendant ( see e.g. People v. Murray, 89 A.D.3d 567, 933 N.Y.S.2d 15 [1st Dept. 2011],lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 960, 944 N.Y.S.2d 489, 967 N.E.2d 714 [2012] ).

TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, SAXE, CATTERSON, DeGRASSE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Anonymous

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2012
98 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Anonymous

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. ANONYMOUS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6380
950 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

People v. Ford

The court concluded that substantial justice dictated the denial of the motion ( see generally People v.…