From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Andujar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea. The record of the plea allocution and the evidence at the hearing on the motion establish that defendant's second counsel, who represented defendant at the plea allocution, provided meaningful representation (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 188 A.D.2d 546, 547, affd 82 N.Y.2d 536).


Summaries of

People v. Andujar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Andujar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NEFTALI ANDUJAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 1008

Citing Cases

People v. Stephenson

Contrary to the defendant's claim, the written instructions on the verdict sheet properly instructed the jury…