From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. American Loan Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1904
69 N.E. 429 (N.Y. 1904)

Opinion

Argued January 7, 1904

Decided January 19, 1904

Barclay E.V. McCarty and James Anderson Hawes for Euphemia A. Hawes, as executrix of Granville P. Hawes, deceased, appellant and respondent.

O.P. Metcalf for Manufacturers and Traders' Bank et al., appellants and respondents.

H.B. Closson and William E. Carnochan for Thomas G. Ritch et al., as executors of Daniel B. Fayerweather, deceased, appellants and respondents.

Clarence E. Thornall for Edward F. Browning et al., as executors of Charles S. Hull, deceased, et al., appellants and respondents. James Dunne for Louis Bauer et al., respondents and appellants.

Alfred Opdyke and William S. Opdyke for receiver, respondent.


So much has been written in the various phases of the proceeding now before us for final review that we need do no more than state our conclusion in the light of a single prefatory observation as to the nature and purpose of the proceeding. Its object is to secure a "a just and fair distribution of the property of the corporation, and of the proceeds thereof, among its fair and honest creditors." (Section 1793, Code Civ. Pro.) The parties now before the court are all "fair and honest" creditors in the same class. Justice and equity, therefore, no less than the express command of the statute, require that there shall be a "just and fair" distribution of the fund among them. Not a distribution among those whose diligence has given direction to the conduct of the proceeding, but among all who are within the descriptive terms of the statute. The statute is our sole guide, and to its peremptory direction, rules of courts and conflicting views of counsel must yield. Our conclusion is that all the unpreferred creditors before the court on this appeal stand upon an equal footing and are entitled to a ratable division among them of the fund in dispute.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified accordingly, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to any of the parties.

PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

People v. American Loan Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1904
69 N.E. 429 (N.Y. 1904)
Case details for

People v. American Loan Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v . THE AMERICAN LOAN AND TRUST…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 1904

Citations

69 N.E. 429 (N.Y. 1904)
69 N.E. 429

Citing Cases

Raymond v. Security Trust Ins. Co.

The receiver was not appointed in dissolution proceedings, but in sequestration proceedings instituted under…

People v. Federal Bank

We find nothing in the statute to indicate that the Legislature intended to deprive claimants of the right to…