From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Amendolare

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 31, 1962
187 N.E.2d 793 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued December 6, 1962

Decided December 31, 1962

Appeal from the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Appellate Part, in the Second Judicial Department, T. VINCENT QUINN, M., BERNARD DUBIN, M.

Sidney G. Sparrow and Robert E. Sparrow for appellant.

Frank D. O'Connor, District Attorney ( Benj. J. Jacobson and William D. Friedmann of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed, the complaint dismissed and the fine remitted upon the ground that some of the evidence introduced to prove the violation of section 986-b of the Penal Law was illegally obtained ( Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643; People v. Loria, 10 N.Y.2d 368) and its introduction excepted to ( People v. O'Neill, 11 N.Y.2d 148). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

People v. Amendolare

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 31, 1962
187 N.E.2d 793 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

People v. Amendolare

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NICK AMENDOLARE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 31, 1962

Citations

187 N.E.2d 793 (N.Y. 1962)
187 N.E.2d 793
237 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

United States v. Thomas

no notion of the law as a "brooding omnipresence" or even a "prophecy;" it rests upon the ineluctable data…