From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alvarez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1990
166 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 15, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's argument that his plea of guilty was coerced is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636), and is not worthy of review in the interest of justice. Moreover, the defendant expressly waived his right to appellate review of the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Williams, 36 N.Y.2d 829, cert denied 423 U.S. 873).

The defendant's claim that his sentence is excessive is without merit, particularly since the minimum term of the indeterminate sentence which was imposed is less than the minimum term authorized by law (see, Penal Law § 220.43, 110.05 Penal [1]; § 70.00 [3][a][i]). Since the People have not taken a cross appeal, and since the illegality of the sentence cannot be said to "adversely affect" the defendant (CPL 470.15), modification of the judgment under review is not warranted (see, People v. Pratt, 119 A.D.2d 839 [illegally low sentence not reviewable on appeal by defendant]; cf., People v. Beach, 152 A.D.2d 772; People v. Miller, 38 A.D.2d 745). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Lawrence, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, and votes to modify the judgment, on the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the conviction from attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, with the following memorandum: The record establishes that the clear intent of the parties and the trial court was to permit the defendant to enter a plea to a class A-II felony, with the imposition of the minimum term of imprisonment. Consequently, under the circumstances, the judgment should be modified by reducing the conviction to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, a class A-II felony, as requested by the People (see, People v. Edwards, 41 A.D.2d 707).


Summaries of

People v. Alvarez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1990
166 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Alvarez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS ALVAREZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 890

Citing Cases

People v. Mathsen

The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentences actually imposed…

People v. Laino

On appeal, both parties agree that the conviction should be reduced to a crime of a lesser degree in order to…