From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Allen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 19, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 558 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1964

Decided November 19, 1964

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, J. WOLFE CHASSEN, J.P., MILTON SHALLECK and JOHN A. VALENTI, JJ., HERMAN WEINKRANTZ, J.P., THOMAS E. ROHAN and KENNETH M. PHIPPS, JJ.

Kalman Finkel and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Frank D. O'Connor, District Attorney ( Benj. J. Jacobson of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and information dismissed. The physical attack on the arresting policeman was a part of resistance to an unlawful arrest ( People v. Dreares, 15 A.D.2d 204, affd. 11 N.Y.2d 906) and it was not excessive in degree ( People v. Cherry, 307 N.Y. 308). On the People's proof in support of an assault, it appears that the physical attack attributed to defendant was not an unrelated occurrence but was in close sequence to and a part of resistance to the arrest.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and BERGAN. Judges DYE and SCILEPPI dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

People v. Allen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 19, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 558 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OTIS ALLEN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 19, 1964

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 558 (N.Y. 1964)
254 N.Y.S.2d 369
202 N.E.2d 911

Citing Cases

United States v. McCarthy

Ibid. The counter-attack should occur in close sequence to the unlawful arrest and as part of the resistance…

People v. Turner

The commotion which inevitably ensued was the result of the gratuitous and forcible invasion of the rally by…