From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1996
233 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 25, 1996.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Mogil, J.), imposed August 11, 1994.

Before: Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ.


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the procedure utilized by the court in determining the amount of restitution; therefore, his challenge on appeal is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 281). In any event, since the defendant agreed at his plea allocution to the amount of restitution imposed by the court, the court did not err in imposing restitution without conducting a hearing ( see, People v Jackson, 201 AD2d 504; see also, People v Lugo, 191 AD2d 648; People v Moore, 176 AD2d 968).


Summaries of

People v. Ali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1996
233 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Ali

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHAHID ALI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 994

Citing Cases

People v. Vazqueztell

05; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281). In any event, since the defendant agreed at his plea allocution…

People v. Taylor

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contentions that the court breached the plea agreement…