From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Aiken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 2002
293 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1999-02914

Submitted March 12, 2002.

April 15, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered February 18, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barbara Lerner of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Robin A. Forshaw, Bonnie H. Stein, and Deborah F. Nathan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in ruling that the People could adduce proof of prior crimes previously committed by the defendant in order to prove intent is without merit. When fraudulent intent is an issue, evidence of other similar acts is admissible to negate the existence of an innocent state of mind (see People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 297-298; People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 242). Furthermore, evidence of prior similar crimes is particularly probative of guilt with respect to charges involving forgery (see People v. Knox, 126 A.D.2d 748).

RITTER, J.P., O'BRIEN, KRAUSMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Aiken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 2002
293 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Aiken

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. NATHAN AIKEN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 239

Citing Cases

People v. Edmunds

Notably, the bogus checks commenced the investigation which led directly to defendant. Also, this evidence…

People v. Eady

We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court's Molineux ruling constituted an abuse of discretion. The…