From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Adames

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 19, 2019
173 A.D.3d 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2018–07720 2018–07721 Ind. No. 443/17, 929/17

06-19-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Reinardo ADAMES, also known as Tito, Appellant.

Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, NY, for appellant. Madeline Singas, Mineola, N.Y. (Kevin C. King and Jared A. Chester of counsel), for respondent.


Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, Mineola, N.Y. (Kevin C. King and Jared A. Chester of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, HECTOR D. LASALLE, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert A. Schwartz, J.), both rendered August 17, 2017, convicting him of attempted operating as a major trafficker under Indictment No. 443/17, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree under Indictment No. 929/17, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his pleas of guilty were not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant did not move to withdraw his pleas or otherwise raise this issue before the Supreme Court (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665–666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's pleas were entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646 ; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16–17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170 ).

Since the only substantive argument raised on the defendant's appeals concerns the voluntariness of his pleas, which claim survives a valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ), we need not reach the People's contention regarding the validity of the defendant's appeal waiver (see People v. Henriquez, 168 A.D.3d 876, 89 N.Y.S.3d 912 ; People v. Bernard, 155 A.D.3d 1059, 65 N.Y.S.3d 457 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Adames

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 19, 2019
173 A.D.3d 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Adames

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Reinardo Adames, also…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4962
100 N.Y.S.3d 567

Citing Cases

People v. Gutierrez

ORDERED that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed. As a threshold matter, since the only substantive…

People v. Gerald

As an initial matter, the People contend that the defendant validly waived his right to appeal and they seek…