From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Abreu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2006
29 A.D.3d 336 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8460.

May 4, 2006.

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered March 21, 2005, resentencing defendant, upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Laura R. Johnson, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Paul Wiener of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Christopher P. Marinelli of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Malone, JJ., concur.


Defendant, who was resentenced from a term of 15 years to life to a term of 12 years pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), claims he is also entitled to have his conviction reduced to second-degree possession based on the amelioration doctrine of People v. Behlog ( 74 NY2d 237) and the new law's change in the weight requirement for first-degree possession. We reject this argument, because the amelioration doctrine does not apply ( People v. Nelson, 21 AD3d 861, lv granted 6 NY3d 757), and because, even if it did apply, defendant's resentencing would not place him, for such purpose, in the posture of a person being newly sentenced ( People v. Quinones, 22 AD3d 218).

We perceive no basis for a further reduction of the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Abreu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2006
29 A.D.3d 336 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Abreu

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ASAIN ABREU, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 336 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3511
813 N.Y.S.2d 302

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

the resentencing provisions are inapplicable here as the defendant was convicted of eight class B felonies .…

People v. Paragas

On appeal, the defendant argues that his conviction should be reduced to criminal possession of a controlled…