Opinion
February 4, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.
Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Relator contends that he was not given written notice, within three days of service of the parole detention warrant, of the time, place and purpose of the preliminary parole revocation hearing, as required by Executive Law § 259-i (3) (c) (iii). Because relator was served with the parole detention warrant on Friday, July 20, 1990, service upon him of written notice concerning the preliminary hearing on Monday, July 23, 1990 was timely (see, People ex rel. Frost v. Meloni, 124 A.D.2d 1032, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 606).
Relator further contends, based on People ex rel. Johnson v New York State Bd. of Parole ( 180 A.D.2d 914), that he should be restored to parole supervision because he was not provided a full board case review of his delinquent time assessment of more than 24 months. We disagree. After the Third Department decision in People ex rel. Johnson v. New York State Bd. of Parole (supra), respondents filed, as an emergency measure, a regulation providing for full board case review of delinquent time assessments of more than 24 months; that regulation became effective on August 12, 1992 (see, 9 NYCRR 8005.21). During the pendency of the proceeding, relator, unlike the petitioner in Johnson, properly received a full board case review of the determination to impose a time assessment in excess of 24 months pursuant to that validly adopted regulation.
Because relator is entitled to administrative review of his remaining contentions, habeas corpus review of those contentions in unavailable (see, Matter of Trimaldi v. Superintendent, 169 A.D.2d 960; see also, People ex rel. Woods v. McGreevy, 191 A.D.2d 938, 941).