From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Schoenwandt v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97710.

November 10, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered February 17, 2005 in Ulster County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Frederick Schoenwandt, Napanoch, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding challenging the calculation of his conditional release and maximum release dates as well as a parole revocation decision. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding and this appeal ensued. During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was conditionally released on parole. Inasmuch as petitioner is no longer in custody, the habeas corpus proceeding must be dismissed as moot ( see People ex rel. Morales v. Campbell, 298 AD2d 740, 741; People ex rel. Graham v. New York State Dept. of Corrections, 280 AD2d 768).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Schoenwandt v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Schoenwandt v. Travis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. FREDERICK SCHOENWANDT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8242
803 N.Y.S.2d 749

Citing Cases

State v. Taylor

In May 2005, petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding alleging that his detainment was illegal…

People v. Roman

During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was released to parole supervision. Thus, because habeas…