From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Richards v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 1986
117 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 10, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Habeas corpus does not lie where petitioner's claims, even if meritorious, would result in suppression of evidence and a new trial, not an immediate release from custody (see, People ex rel. Williams v. Scully, 107 A.D.2d 729; People ex rel. Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N.Y., 93 A.D.2d 768, affd 60 N.Y.2d 648). Bracken, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Richards v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 1986
117 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Richards v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. HARRY RICHARDS, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Napoli v. Annucci

Habeas corpus will lie only when the petitioner is entitled to immediate release (see People ex rel. Kaplan…

People ex Rel. Graham v. McClellan

In addition, we see no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure (see, People ex rel. Grady v…