From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Pyclik v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1981
81 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

May 27, 1981

Appeal from the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Simons, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed and a new parole revocation hearing granted. Memorandum: Petitioner's right to a parole revocation hearing before a "`neutral and detached' hearing body" (Morrissey v Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 489), was denied by virtue of the fact that the hearing officer had appeared as an attorney for the State at a prior proceeding in which petitioner's underlying conviction had been challenged. It is not necessary to decide whether the revocation hearing was affected by actual prejudice inasmuch as even the appearance of impropriety should be avoided (see People ex rel. Sweeney v Smith, 50 A.D.2d 722).


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Pyclik v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1981
81 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Pyclik v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. STANLEY J. PYCLIK, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1981

Citations

81 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Shippens v. Smith

The hearing was conducted by an associate counsel for the Division of Parole, who had been designated by the…

Matter of Benitez v. Coughlin

The determination of a Hearing Officer in a prison disciplinary proceeding will not be disturbed where, as…