Opinion
Argued February 21, 1974
Decided February 22, 1974
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.
Maurice Brill for appellant.
Eugene Gold, District Attorney ( Roger Bennet Adler of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM. In a pending criminal action, habeas corpus brought on the ground of denial of the right to a speedy trial generally should be denied, without necessarily reaching the merits, when the action is brought to trial. Because habeas corpus depends upon a clear right to a discharge and is a summary remedy, its denial does not preclude raising again of the issue of a right to a speedy trial in the criminal action or any appeal therein provided the issue has been preserved by proper objection, motion or otherwise.
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed, without costs.