Opinion
Argued June 10, 1902
Decided June 24, 1902
F.E. Lewis and E. Lewis for appellant.
Thomas D. Watkins for respondent.
Order affirmed on the ground that the relator was not in office, but without costs, as that was not true when the proceeding was instituted; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.