From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Kohler v. Kidney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Summary

In People ex rel. Kohler v. Kidney (183 App. Div. 921; affd., 223 N.Y. 666) it was held that under Prison Law, section 217, as it then read, a delinquent paroled prisoner could not be retaken unless his delinquency had been declared by the Board of Parole before the term of his original sentence had expired.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Atkins v. Jennings

Opinion

March, 1918.


Order affirmed. All concurred, except Merrell and De Angelis, JJ., who dissented.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Kohler v. Kidney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

In People ex rel. Kohler v. Kidney (183 App. Div. 921; affd., 223 N.Y. 666) it was held that under Prison Law, section 217, as it then read, a delinquent paroled prisoner could not be retaken unless his delinquency had been declared by the Board of Parole before the term of his original sentence had expired.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Atkins v. Jennings
Case details for

People ex Rel. Kohler v. Kidney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. LOUIS KOHLER, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1918

Citations

183 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Atkins v. Jennings

( Anderson v. Corall, 263 U.S. 193.) In People ex rel. Kohler v. Kidney ( 183 App. Div. 921; affd., 223 N.Y.…

People ex Rel. Atkins v. Jennings

No authority has been called to my attention which authorized the Board of Parole to impose conditions to the…