From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Freeman v. Mancusi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1966
27 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

December 1, 1966

Appeal from the Wyoming County Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.


Order reversed and matter remitted to Wyoming County Court for a further hearing in accordance with the Memorandum. Memorandum: The relator is presently serving a sentence of not less than two and one-half and not more than five years in Attica State Prison. He alleges in his petition that following release on parole he was returned to prison as a parole violator, and that the alleged violation and requirement that he serve out in prison the balance of his term was a result of certain actions and representations by the parole authorities which, in effect, constituted entrapment and fraud. Upon the return of the writ the court addressed a brief inquiry to the relator as to the substance of his claim and then stated that he would consider the case submitted and reserve decision. Thereafter he ordered the writ dismissed and the relator remanded to the custody of the Warden of Attica Prison. While the courts have uniformly held that the discretionary power vested in the Parole Board to revoke a prisoner's parole cannot be reviewed by habeas corpus, the actions of the board are not beyond judicial review if they are in violation of the statutes under which the board derives its power. "The statutes declare that the action of the Board in releasing or refusing to release prisoners shall not be reviewable if in accordance with law." ( Matter of Hines v. State Board of Parole, 293 N.Y. 254, 257.) The petition here charges arbitrary and fraudulent conduct on the part of the parole authorities which, if proved, would constitute a complete failure on their part to exercise the discretion accorded them by law. The merit and substance of the allegations can only be determined by the court after a hearing at which whatever proof petitioner may have to support them may be submitted. All concur except Williams, P.J. and Henry, J., who dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Freeman v. Mancusi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1966
27 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Freeman v. Mancusi

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JAMES FREEMAN, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1966

Citations

27 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Robertson v. Div. of Parole

ss from one in which the factual determination is made by a Trial Judge, reviewable as to the weight of the…

People ex Rel. McNair v. West

But it is now well established that Parole Board actions are nonreviewable only "if done in accordance with…