From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Feliz v. Smith

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
Mar 17, 2022
203 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

532508

03-17-2022

The PEOPLE of the State of New York EX REL. Juan FELIZ, Appellant, v. Brandon J. SMITH, as Superintendent of Greene Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Alma D. Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for Brandon J. Smith and another, respondents. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, New York City (John T. Komondorea of counsel), for Bronx County District Attorney, respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Alma D. Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for Brandon J. Smith and another, respondents.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, New York City (John T. Komondorea of counsel), for Bronx County District Attorney, respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Aarons, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Fisher, J.), entered November 23, 2020 in Greene County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner is an incarcerated individual at Greene Correctional Facility (hereinafter GCF) serving a prison sentence of eight years upon his 2016 conviction of criminal sexual act in the first degree. In October 2020, petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking his immediate release from GCF asserting that his underlying health conditions place him at increased risk if infected with the novel coronavirus responsible for causing COVID–19. Respondents filed returns and moved to dismiss, submitting affidavits detailing the protocols and policies in place at GCF to address petitioner's COVID–19 asymptomatic infection and the spread of COVID–19 throughout the prison generally. Supreme Court denied the application on the merits based upon our decision in People ex rel. Carroll v. Keyser, 184 A.D.3d 189, 125 N.Y.S.3d 484 (2020), among other reasons. Petitioner appeals.

We affirm. Upon review and consideration of petitioner's circumstances, i.e., his medical conditions, petitioner has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his detention at GCF was illegal or unconstitutional (see People ex rel. James v. Keyser, 193 A.D.3d 1163, 1163–1164, 141 N.Y.S.3d 726 [2021] ; People ex rel. Carroll v. Keyser, 184 A.D.3d at 192–193, 125 N.Y.S.3d 484 ). For the reasons stated in ( People ex rel. Figueroa v. Keyser, 193 A.D.3d 1148, 145 N.Y.S.3d 663 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 905, 2021 WL 3926002 [2021] ), petitioner's claim that his continued confinement is "cruel and unusual" ( U.S. Const 8th Amend; see N.Y. Const, art I, § 5 ) and his related substantive due process claim (see U.S. Const 14th Amend; NY Const, art I, § 6 ) are without merit. Petitioner's remaining claim that he should have been afforded a hearing is likewise without merit, as such a hearing is not required where, as here, " ‘upon the pleadings, papers and admissions ... no triable issues of fact are raised’ " ( People ex rel. Robertson v. New York State Div. of Parole, 67 N.Y.2d 197, 203, 501 N.Y.S.2d 634, 492 N.E.2d 762 [1986], quoting CPLR 409[b] ). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly denied the application.

We note similar matters in which habeas corpus has been found to be an appropriate remedy (see People ex rel. Figueroa v. Keyser, 193 A.D.3d 1148, 1149 n. 2, 145 N.Y.S.3d 663 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 905, 2021 WL 3926002 [2021] ; People ex rel. Tse v. Barometre, 188 A.D.3d 714, 715, 131 N.Y.S.3d 896 [2020] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Feliz v. Smith

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
Mar 17, 2022
203 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People ex rel. Feliz v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York ex rel. Juan Feliz, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
203 A.D.3d 1422

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Harris v. Howard

We have reviewed the facts and circumstances specific to petitioner, particularly his various medical…

People ex rel. Walker v. Lynn

Petitioner's remaining claims have been examined and we likewise find that none establishes the illegality of…