From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Eckerson v. Zundel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1898
34 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

November Term, 1898.


The defect for which the amendment granted by the Special Term permits the tax roll to be assailed, if it exists, renders the assessments void on their face, and under the authority of The People ex rel. D. H.C. Co. v. Parker ( 117 N.Y. 86) a certiorari, under the law of 1880, should not issue to relieve from such an error. Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs in one case and disbursements in all and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. All concurred.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Eckerson v. Zundel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1898
34 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Eckerson v. Zundel

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York ex rel. J. Esler Eckerson and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1898

Citations

34 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
54 N.Y.S. 1112

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Friendly v. Davenport

It is probably true that merely calling a paper an assessment roll, which in form or substance is not such…