From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. David v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 24, 2004
12 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

93760

November 24, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County (Becker, J.), entered March 21, 2003, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


Petitioner was released on parole but was subsequently charged with violating the terms of such parole. Following a preliminary hearing, the Hearing Officer found that probable cause existed to believe that petitioner violated the terms of his probation based upon the positive urinalysis test results indicating petitioner's use of cocaine and marihuana, the violation of release report and testimony from his parole officer. County Court thereafter denied petitioner's subsequent application for habeas corpus relief which contested the basis of the parole violation. This appeal ensued. Inasmuch as there has been a final revocation determination, the challenge to the preliminary hearing has been rendered moot ( see People ex rel. McCummings v. De Angelo, 259 AD2d 794, lv denied 93 NY2d 810).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

People ex rel. David v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 24, 2004
12 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People ex rel. David v. New York State Division of Parole

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CHARLES C. DAVID JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 24, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
784 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

State v. Kenneth

First addressing mootness, the remedy for any error with respect to respondent's waiver of the right to a…

People

For the following reasons, petitioner's application is denied. First and foremost, it is well settled that…