From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Catapano v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Broughton, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing officer complied with 7 NYCRR 254.5 (b) in determining that petitioner's witnesses should testify out of his presence (see, People ex rel. Bradley v Smith, 115 A.D.2d 225). We find no error in the refusal to interview Mr. Folkes, a Commission monitor, as a witness. The Commission's policy that its monitors should remain neutral and not testify at disciplinary proceedings is reasonable and consistent with the orderly administration of a correctional institution.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Catapano v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Catapano v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. PETER CATAPANO, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Coughlin

Here, at the time the appellees precluded the prison monitor from testifying, the legality of the New York…

Matter of Young v. Coughlin

Next, we reject the contention that petitioner was denied due process as a result of the Hearing Officer's…