Opinion
Submitted April 22, 1999
June 7, 1999
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), dated March 23, 1998, which denied his application for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.
M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Dille of counsel), for appellant.
Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Christine A. Thompson of counsel), for respondents.
DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
While on parole from a prior conviction, the petitioner was found to be in violation of the terms of his release and was reimprisoned. The petitioner thereafter commenced this habeas corpus proceeding asserting that his parole had been improperly revoked and that he was being unlawfully detained. The Supreme Court denied the application for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. During the pendency of the petitioner's appeal to this court, he was returned to parole supervision. Accordingly, habeas corpus relief is no longer available and this appeal has been rendered academic ( see, People ex rel. Donohoe v. Montanye, 35 N.Y.2d 221; People ex rel. DeFlumer v. Strack, 212 A.D.2d 555).
On the record presented, conversion of this matter into a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 is not appropriate ( see, People ex rel. DeFlumer v. Strack, supra; People ex rel. Hampton v. Scully, 166 A.D.2d 734).