Opinion
January 26, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.).
Respondent's failure in this case to strictly comply with the time requirements set forth in 39 RCNY 1-02 did not, as petitioner contends, rise to the level of a due process violation. Upon the record as a whole, we conclude that petitioner was afforded adequate notice of and opportunity to be heard with respect to the grounds upon which his redesignation was ultimately premised, and that he was not prejudiced by respondent's delay ( see, Matter of Alevras v. Coughlin, 87 A.D.2d 868; People ex rel. Williams v. Ward, 73 A.D.2d 941).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.