From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Accurso v. McMann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 24, 1965
23 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

May 24, 1965


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. The delay of three and one-half months in pronouncing sentence was not within the rule "to be applied to extremely long and unreasonable delays only". ( People ex rel. Harty v. Fay ( 10 N.Y.2d 374, 379.) The court did not lose jurisdiction and no procedural objection under section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was raised. ( Matter of Hogan v. Bohan, 305 N.Y. 110, 112; People ex rel. Battista v. Christian, 249 N.Y. 314; People ex rel. Marchese v. La Vallee, 23 A.D.2d 537; People v. Persico, 45 Misc.2d 421; People v. Warrelman, 42 Misc.2d 783. ) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Accurso v. McMann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 24, 1965
23 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Accurso v. McMann

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. WILLIAM ACCURSO, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 24, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

People v. Harper

Some cases simply cite Harty (supra) or CPL 380.30, thus merely begging the question. (E.g., People ex rel.…

People v. Bressette

The failure of the court to fix a date for pronouncing sentence and the 19-day lapse between the entering of…