From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1951
96 N.E.2d 756 (N.Y. 1951)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1951

Decided January 18, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, McGEEHAN, J.

Sidney S. Levine for appellant.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Morris Handel and Imre Schwarz of counsel), for respondents.


Since the Appellate Division order fails to make the specifications required by section 602 of the Civil Practice Act, we are compelled to presume that questions of fact were not considered and to "treat the Appellate Division order as being a determination on the law only" ( People ex rel. Sheffield Farms Co. v. Lilly, 295 N.Y. 354, 356; Rochette Parzini Corp. v. Campo, 301 N.Y. 228). So regarded, the order cannot be sustained. Questions of fact as to the value of the premises during the taxable years in question are presented by the record. The order is accordingly reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division "for determination upon the questions of fact raised in that court" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 606).

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1951
96 N.E.2d 756 (N.Y. 1951)
Case details for

People ex Rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. 711 CORPORATION, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 18, 1951

Citations

96 N.E.2d 756 (N.Y. 1951)
96 N.E.2d 756

Citing Cases

People v. Mack

Prior to the enactment of the CPLR, a jury had to be presented with the facts upon which an expert witness…

People ex Rel. 711 Corporation v. Chambers

Present — Glennon, J.P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. The order and judgment of the Court of…