From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People c. v. Duchesne

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 29, 2000
727 N.E.2d 1249 (N.Y. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 2000

February 29, 2000

Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Risa Gerson, Richard M. Greenberg and Rosemary Herbert of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Sandra E. Cavazos and Patrick J. Hynes of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record does not support defendant's assertion that the hearing court abused its discretion in balancing the applicable factors in conducting the Sandoval hearing in defendant's second trial. Defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.


Summaries of

People c. v. Duchesne

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 29, 2000
727 N.E.2d 1249 (N.Y. 2000)
Case details for

People c. v. Duchesne

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE c., Respondent, v. RICHARD DUCHESNE, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 29, 2000

Citations

727 N.E.2d 1249 (N.Y. 2000)
727 N.E.2d 1249

Citing Cases

People v. Couser

I agree with the majority's observation that this Court has not yet directly addressed whether a sentence…