From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pensick Gordon, Inc., v. California Motor Express

U.S.
Dec 3, 1962
371 U.S. 184 (1962)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

No. 222.

Decided December 3, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 302 F.2d 391.

Carl M. Gould for petitioner.

Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.


The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.


Summaries of

Pensick Gordon, Inc., v. California Motor Express

U.S.
Dec 3, 1962
371 U.S. 184 (1962)
Case details for

Pensick Gordon, Inc., v. California Motor Express

Case Details

Full title:PENSICK GORDON, INC., v . CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 3, 1962

Citations

371 U.S. 184 (1962)

Citing Cases

Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. U.S.

Interpretation of the T.I.M.E. decision is not without difficulty; it was a 5 to 4 decision and both the…

Danna v. Air France

The Court said: See also Pensick Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express, 371 U.S. 184, 83 S.Ct. 264, 9…