From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penrod v. Scioto Cty. Pros. Atty

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 24, 1991
571 N.E.2d 436 (Ohio 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-999

Submitted March 12, 1991 —

Decided April 24, 1991.

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Scioto County, Nos. 1771 and 1818.

Charles E. Smith and James Scott Smith, for appellee.

Lynn A. Grimshaw, prosecuting attorney, and R. Randolph Rumble, for appellant.

David L. Landefeld, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.


The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., dissents.


I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in that court's opinion rendered on April 3, 1990.


Summaries of

Penrod v. Scioto Cty. Pros. Atty

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 24, 1991
571 N.E.2d 436 (Ohio 1991)
Case details for

Penrod v. Scioto Cty. Pros. Atty

Case Details

Full title:PENROD, APPELLEE, v. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF SCIOTO COUNTY, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 24, 1991

Citations

571 N.E.2d 436 (Ohio 1991)
571 N.E.2d 436