From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 794 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided May 20, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, CHARLES S. WHITMAN, JR., J.

James E. Frankel for appellant.

Harold N. Schwinger for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. Respondent's claims with respect to the arbitrator's refusal to grant an adjournment and his refusal to accept certain evidence raise no cognizable objection to the arbitration award, given our narrow scope of review (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par 1, cl [i]).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 794 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Peninsula National Bank v. Joseph M. Turecamo, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PENINSULA NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH M. TURECAMO, INC., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 20, 1982

Citations

56 N.Y.2d 794 (N.Y. 1982)
452 N.Y.S.2d 398
437 N.E.2d 1155

Citing Cases

Matter of Sheet Asphalt v. Perez Interboro

The respondent failed to state a legally cognizable ground upon which to predicate a vacatur of the…

Landau v. Stracquadaine

Such an attack may be made on the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511 (b) upon MVAIC'S application to confirm the…