From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penaloza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 8, 2021
323 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-1434

09-08-2021

Marcelino PENALOZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Marcelino Penaloza, Bonifay, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Marcelino Penaloza, Bonifay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Christakis v. Tivoli Terrace, LLC , 219 So. 3d 85, 86–87 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (holding that the January 1, 2015 amendment to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(i)(3) does not have retroactive effect so as to undo the abandonment of a motion for new trial which resulted under the prior version of the rule when the notice of appeal was filed before the filing of a signed, written order disposing of the motion for new trial filed by the appealing party).

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Penaloza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 8, 2021
323 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Penaloza v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marcelino PENALOZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Sep 8, 2021

Citations

323 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)