From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penachio v. Saati Society

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1900
33 Misc. 751 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

November, 1900.

Andrea Palmeri, for appellant.

John Palmieri, for respondent.


The by-laws of the defendant were modified four years before the plaintiff's illness, by providing the said benefits were confined to members residing within New York, Brooklyn or Astoria. Subsequent to this amendment, the plaintiff signed the new by-laws and expressly declared his submission to the same. It being conceded that the plaintiff was a resident of Jersey City at the time of the illness in question, he was not entitled to sick benefits. The judgment awarding them is absolutely without proof to sustain it and must be reversed.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Penachio v. Saati Society

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1900
33 Misc. 751 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Penachio v. Saati Society

Case Details

Full title:ROSARIO PENACHIO, Respondent, v . THE SAATI SOCIETY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1900

Citations

33 Misc. 751 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Cipriano v. Societa San Salvatore

An amendment could be adopted by the organization providing that non-resident members must procure affidavits…