From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pena v. Schur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1997
245 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 23, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


Since it is clear, as a matter of law, that plaintiffs' own conduct in engaging in rough horseplay, which resulted in their crashing through a window, was the sole proximate cause of their injuries, and that defendants' negligence, if any, was not a proximate cause, the court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment ( see, Kelly v. Great Neck Union Free School Dist., 192 A.D.2d 696, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 658; see also, Lee v. Durow's Rest., 238 A.D.2d 384).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Pena v. Schur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1997
245 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Pena v. Schur

Case Details

Full title:LUIS A. PENA et al., Appellants, v. PAUL SCHUR et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

Martinez v. City of New York

Issues of fact exist precluding summary judgment in appellant's favor. Such factual issues include whether it…

Emanuel v. Sheridan Transp

Plaintiff's own expert testified that the purpose of having a two-member crew was to permit one person to…