From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelliccio v. TCW Realty Fund Via Holding Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 2002
291 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-10934

Argued January 10, 2002.

February 6, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.), dated October 17, 2000, as granted the separate motions of the defendants TCW Realty Fund VIA Holding Company and TCW Realty Fund VIB Limited Partnership and the defendant Team Construction Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Barry, McTiernan Moore, New York, N.Y. (Laurel A. Wedinger of counsel), for appellants.

Fiedelman McGaw, Jericho, N.Y. (Andrew Zajac and James K. O'Sullivan of counsel), for respondents TCW Realty Fund VIA Holding Company and TCW Realty Fund VIB Limited Partnership.

Agoglia, Fassberg, Holland Crowe, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Craig D. Holland of counsel), for respondent Team Construction Co., Inc.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Based on the plaintiffs' deposition testimony and the meteorological records which indicated that a storm was in progress, the defendants met their burden of establishing that they did not have a reasonably sufficient time from the cessation of the precipitation to remedy the alleged dangerous condition (see, Chapman v. City of New York, 268 A.D.2d 498; Taylor v. New York City Tr. Auth., 266 A.D.2d 384; Whitt v. St. John's Episcopal Hosp., 258 A.D.2d 648). The injured plaintiff's assertions that she must have slipped on old ice because snow and ice removal was undertaken by the defendants the day before her fall is mere speculation and insufficient to raise an issue of fact as to the defendants' liability (see, Bernstein v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 1020, 1022; Trainor v. Dayton Seaside Assocs. No. 3, 282 A.D.2d 524; Denton v. Klein Middle School, 234 A.D.2d 257; Porcari v. S.E.M. Mgt. Corp., 184 A.D.2d 556).

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pelliccio v. TCW Realty Fund Via Holding Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 2002
291 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Pelliccio v. TCW Realty Fund Via Holding Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA M. PELLICCIO, ET AL., appellants, v. TCW REALTY FUND VIA HOLDING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 120

Citing Cases

Zimmer v. Kimco Realty Corp.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Based on the evidence presented by the defendant in support…

Nazario v. Chavez

The defendants presented evidence that when Mr. Nazario slipped and fell it was either still snowing or the…