From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PELL v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 4, 1981
393 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-2278.

January 27, 1981. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1981.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Thomas E. Scott, Judge.

Louis Winter, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Petitioner, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. The entitlement to discharge for violation of the speedy trial rule, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191, is a matter which could have been raised on direct appeal and is not the proper subject for collateral attack. Morrison v. State, 283 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); see also, Adams v. State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla. 1980); Durcan v. State, 383 So.2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Clements v. State, 320 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Phillips v. State, 313 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

PELL v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 4, 1981
393 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

PELL v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS PELL, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 4, 1981

Citations

393 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Bean v. State

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED on the authority of Pell v. State, 393 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). LETTS, C.J., and…

Adkinson v. State

An issue which could and should have been raised on direct appeal is not a proper subject matter for…