Pedro v. Jaddou

Full title: MIQUELINA PEDRO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UR M. JADDOU, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 16, 2024

2:23-cv-01456-TL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 16, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01456-TL

07-16-2024

MIQUELINA PEDRO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UR M. JADDOU, et al., Defendants.

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office GIBBS HOUSTON PAUW MINDA A. THORWARD Attorney for Plaintiffs

TANA LIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office

GIBBS HOUSTON PAUW MINDA A. THORWARD Attorney for Plaintiffs

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TANA LIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the parties stipulate to the dismissal of this case without prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs. Plaintiffs brought this litigation pursuant to the Mandamus Act and the Administrative Procedure Act seeking, inter alia, to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate their Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal. USCIS has adjudicated the application and this case is now moot.

I certify that this memorandum contains 77 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This case is dismissed without prejudice. It is so ORDERED.