From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedersen v. Pedersen

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 1, 1979
600 P.2d 913 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 27379, CA 13047

Argued May 30, 1979

Affirmed as modified October 1, 1979

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County.

James A. Norman, Judge.

Gordon G. Carlson, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Donald S. Kelley, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Luoma, Kelley Wolke, Roseburg.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton, Buttler and Joseph, Judges.


THORNTON, J.

Affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.



Wife moved for an order modifying a 1966 divorce decree by increasing the amount for child support. Husband is presently paying $75 a month support for one son, born June 22, 1960, and $100 a month for one son, born November 25, 1963. The trial court denied wife's motion and wife appeals.

On appeal wife contends that since the last modification, on January 24, 1968, the cost of supporting the children has more than doubled. She argues that defendant is well able to increase his support payments because his income has increased from approximately $10,000 per year gross in 1968 to $18,555.08 per year gross in 1977.

Husband answers these arguments by pointing out that he is under heavy expense in supporting the four children of his second marriage plus two of his wife's minor children by her former marriage.

Without detailing all the facts, it is our conclusion after examining this record that the decree should be modified by increasing the support payments to $125 per month per child.

Affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.



Summaries of

Pedersen v. Pedersen

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 1, 1979
600 P.2d 913 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Pedersen v. Pedersen

Case Details

Full title:PEDERSEN, Appellant, v. PEDERSEN, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 1, 1979

Citations

600 P.2d 913 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
600 P.2d 913

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Tucker

Thus, appellant has established a prima facie case of reversibility on the issue of the amount of the award…

Smith v. Smith

APPENDIXFather's Mother's Number Needs MonthlyMonthly Monthly Of Of SupportCase Income Income Children…