Opinion
Argued October 9, 1893
Decided October 24, 1893
Milton A. Fowler for appellant.
C.B. Herrick for respondents.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur except ANDREWS, Ch. J., EARL and GRAY, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Peckham v. Dutchess County Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1893
139 N.Y. 642 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Peckham v. Dutchess County Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1893
139 N.Y. 642 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Peckham v. Dutchess County Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:MARY A. PECKHAM et al., Respondents, v . THE DUTCHESS COUNTY RAILROAD…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 24, 1893
Citations
139 N.Y. 642 (N.Y. 1893)
54 N.Y. St. Rptr. 932
Citing Cases
People ex Rel. Frost v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
The very statute which gave existence and power to this corporation limited its rights to the preservation of…
Neuhaus v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyJudgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, any ambiguity in the deed prepared by defendant, which…