From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEASE ELLIMAN, INC., v. HOPT

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 8, 1930
136 Misc. 825 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)

Opinion

May 8, 1930.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Goodspeed Post, for the appellant.

Montgomery, Peabody Grace, for the respondent.


The plaintiff broker had substantially performed his duty when the conclusion of the transaction was deliberately prevented by defendant's refusal to proceed.

The risks of failure assumed by a broker, as enumerated in the leading case of Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Co. ( 83 N.Y. 378, 383, 384), do not include bad faith on the part of the employer.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff for the amount demanded in the complaint, with costs.

All concur; present, BIJUR, CALLAHAN and PETERS, JJ.


Summaries of

PEASE ELLIMAN, INC., v. HOPT

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 8, 1930
136 Misc. 825 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
Case details for

PEASE ELLIMAN, INC., v. HOPT

Case Details

Full title:PEASE ELLIMAN, INC., Appellant, v. MARGARET BOWLER HOPT, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 8, 1930

Citations

136 Misc. 825 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
242 N.Y.S. 180

Citing Cases

Wiesenberger v. Mayers

         Appellant contends that inasmuch as the sellers availed themselves of the escape clause, a…