From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Hancock Son

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 18, 1918
78 So. 806 (Ala. 1918)

Opinion

5 Div. 705.

April 18, 1918.

J. W. Strother, of Dadeville, for appellant. George A. Sorrell, of Alexander City, for appellee.


If there be any error in the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the lower court, that error is based on a finding of facts. It has been uniformly ruled by this court that we would not review the Court of Appeals as to findings of facts. If the facts as found by the Court of Appeals are as stated in the opinion, then the decision is correct. We find no principle of law decided erroneously.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pearson v. Hancock Son

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 18, 1918
78 So. 806 (Ala. 1918)
Case details for

Pearson v. Hancock Son

Case Details

Full title:PEARSON v. HANCOCK SON

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 18, 1918

Citations

78 So. 806 (Ala. 1918)
201 Ala. 428

Citing Cases

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Hereford

Lange, Simpson Brantley, of Birmingham, opposed. The statement in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, that…