From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Forest River, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 20, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-679-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Mar. 20, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-679-JJB-RLB

03-20-2014

WENDELL PAYNE, ET AL. v. FOREST RIVER, INC.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated November 7, 2013 (doc. no. 5). The objections filed by plaintiffs make the same arguments and lack merit for the reasons considered by the magistrate judge.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the court finds that defendant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that diversity jurisdiction exists and the defendant's removal was procedurally sound; therefore, the Motion for Remand is DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 20th day of March, 2014.

___________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Payne v. Forest River, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 20, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-679-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Mar. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Payne v. Forest River, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WENDELL PAYNE, ET AL. v. FOREST RIVER, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 20, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-679-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Mar. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Carter v. Strategic Rest. Acquisition Co.

"); Scott v. Office Depot, Inc., No. 14-791-JJB-RLB, 2015 WL 2137458, at *4 n.1 (M.D. La. May 7, 2015)…