From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1992
186 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 26, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed, as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; see, Pavia v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 183 A.D.2d 189 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J.P., Miller, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1992
186 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK PAVIA, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 100

Citing Cases

Powers v. Canandaigua Med. Grp.

In support of its motion, defendant met its initial burden of establishing that it did not breach the…

Alva v. Hurley, Fox, Selig, Caprari & Kelleher

Recovery against the malpractice attorney is only allowed to the extent the underlying judgment would have…